The Holy Java

Building the right thing, building it right, fast

Archive for January, 2015

Challenging Myself With Coplien’s Why Most Unit Testing is Waste

Posted by Jakub Holý on January 26, 2015

James O. Coplien has written in 2014 the thought-provoking essay Why Most Unit Testing is Waste and further elaborates the topic in his Segue. I love testing but I also value challenging my views to expand my understanding so it was a valuable read. When encountering something so controversial, it’s crucial to set aside one’s emotions and opinions and ask: “Provided that it is true, what in my world view might need questioning and updating?” Judge for yourself how well have I have managed it. (Note: This post is not intended as a full and impartial summary of his writing but rather a overveiw of what I may learn from it.)

Perhaps the most important lesson is this: Don’t blindly accept fads, myths, authorities and “established truths.” Question everything, collect experience, judge for yourself. As J. Coplien himself writes:

Be skeptical of yourself: measure, prove, retry. Be skeptical of me for heaven’s sake.

I am currently fond of unit testing so my mission is now to critically confront Coplien’s ideas and my own preconceptions with practical experience on my next projects.

I would suggest that the main thing you take away isn’t “minimize unit testing” but rather “value thinking, focus on system testing, employ code reviews and other QA measures.”

I’ll list my main take-aways first and go into detail later on:
Read the rest of this entry »


Posted in Testing | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

Running JavaScript Tests On a CI Server With Karma, Chrome And Fake X

Posted by Jakub Holý on January 13, 2015

So I want to run my JavaScript tests in a browser on our CI server. But the server has no graphical environment and the tests do not run under PhantomJS 1.x because it uses too old WebKit without ES5. The solution? Use a real browser and fake X via Xvfb. The browser I use is Chrome though Firefox would like work as well.

In code:
Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Languages, Testing | Tagged: | Comments Off on Running JavaScript Tests On a CI Server With Karma, Chrome And Fake X

Focus & Do the Simplest Thing Possible

Posted by Jakub Holý on January 10, 2015

Credit: Dennis Jarvis, CC

Are you tired of days spent in front of the screen, with no results to show? Have you once again engaged in yak shaving? Today, after having failed previously, I have finally managed to solve a problem while avoiding this trap by following rigorously two guidelines preached by grandmaster programmers. Be warned: Following this approach, you will get a working solution – but you won’t like it. It will be ugly, stained by compromises, far from the elegant solution you wish for. But if your resources are limited and you want to avoid death by too many yaks, this is your only option. But first, what are these guidelines?

One: Maintain a laser-sharp focus. A great programmer is constantly aware of what she is trying to achieve and never strays far from it. If the path leads away, she backs up. If something else pops up, she writes it down for later and gets back to the job. This is essentially about deciding what not to do. (Many thanks to Kent Beck for sharing his focus secret!)

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in SW development | Tagged: | 1 Comment »

Continuous Delivery Digest: Ch.9 Testing Non-Functional Requirements

Posted by Jakub Holý on January 8, 2015

(Cross-posted from

Digest of chapter 9 of the Continuous Delivery bible by Humble and Farley. See also the digest of ch 8: Automated Acceptance Testing.

(“cross-functional” might be better as they too are crucial for functionality)

  • f.ex. security, usability, maintainability, auditability, configurability but especially capacity, throughput, performance
  • performance = time to process 1 transaction (tx); throughput = #tx/a period; capacity = max throughput we can handle under a given load while maintaining acceptable response times.
  • NFRs determine the architecture so we must define them early; all (ops, devs, testers, customer) should meet to estimate their impact (it costs to increase any of them and often they go contrary to each other, e.g. security and performance)
  • das appropriate, you can either create specific stories for NFRs (e.g. capacity; => easier to prioritize explicitely) or/and add them as requirements to feature stories
  • if poorly analyzed then they constrain thinking, lead to overdesign and inappropriate optimization
  • only ever optimize based on facts, i.e. realistic measurements (if you don’t know it: developers are really terrible at guessing the source of performance problems)

A strategy to address capacity problems:

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Testing | Tagged: , | Comments Off on Continuous Delivery Digest: Ch.9 Testing Non-Functional Requirements

Notes On Automated Acceptance Testing (from the Continuous Delivery book)

Posted by Jakub Holý on January 8, 2015

(Cross-posted from

These are my rather extensive notes from reading the chapter 8 on Automated Acceptance Testing in the Continuous Delivery bible by Humble and Farley. There is plenty of very good advice that I just had to take record of. Acceptance testing is an exciting and important subject. Why should you care about it? Because:

We know from experience that without excellent automated acceptance test coverage, one of three things happens: Either a lot of time is spent trying to find and fix bugs at the end of the process when you thought you were done, or you spend a great deal of time and money on manual acceptance and regression testing, or you end up releasing poor-quality software.

Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in SW development, Testing | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

The blog’s year 2014 in review

Posted by Jakub Holý on January 5, 2015

The stats helper monkeys prepared a 2014 annual report for this blog.

Here’s an excerpt:

The Louvre Museum has 8.5 million visitors per year. This blog was viewed about 170,000 times in 2014. If it were an exhibit at the Louvre Museum, it would take about 7 days for that many people to see it.

Click here to see the complete report.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on The blog’s year 2014 in review